New Zealand and Australia Both are Terrorist | terrorist attack in New Zealand
mosque
Answer is Not, Not and Not but
In a safe and peaceful country
like New Zealand, in the Church of Almighty Orlando in the mosques
of Christchurch, a new person enters with automotive gun and kills about 50+ Muslims by firing blindly and during their autumn reloads several times.
Will anyone like sympathizers from Liberal, Secular or West and Europe like
to answer our questions?
▪ Is the shooter alone a
terrorist or all Australia terrorist, if alone is a terrorist, then why is it
called the whole Muslim nation on the basis of one's fault?
▪ Is the shooter's religious
book motivated him to kill Muslims if not otherwise why is Koran called a book
of extremism?
▪ Is the shooter alone a
terrorist or a Christian living in the entire world will also be called
terrorists? If not, then why is the label of terrorism on the Muslims who live
in the whole world?
▪ Will the person who alone
shoots punishment be punished or will be raised on the religion of the world,
which is in the whole world, if not, why not fierce the crisis in Iraq, Syria,
Libya and other Muslim countries in the direction of Nihon al-Zion ?
▪ Most distressing inside the world is Muslims too. Most of all, this is also known as the Muslim world and terrorists are called Muslims as well. Why?
▪ Will Liberalism and
Secularism supporters still make human hands chains?
▪ Will the profiles on social
media still be changed?
▪ Will Australia and New
Zealand still be called terrorists?
▪ Will the names of these two
countries still be blacklisted?
No, it would not be like that because it was martyred to my Muslims if
a Muslim was involved in this incident or was killed without non-Muslim, then
the Liberal and Western world had to lift up on the sky and the earth would
have touched the whole nation. But now it will not happen because Muslims are
killed and then die daily.
